AI Invoice Audit & Overpayment Prevention
Why three-way matching and AP automation still miss commercial overpayments.
Nothing in AP is broken. The commercial truth was simply never in the room.
Rates, price lists, escalation, discount or index rules are not reflected correctly at invoice line level.
Duplicate payment detection across invoices, POs and entities — the same line, milestone, service period or charge billed more than once.
Billed quantities, units, conversions, taxes or calculations differ from approved and received facts.
Services, deliverables or milestones are billed before acceptance or without required evidence.
Charges exceed contract, SOW, PO, workstream or period caps when assessed across transactions.
Credits are not applied; expenses, freight, handling, expedite, tooling or pass-through fees breach agreed rules.
System of Outcomes
Detect → Recover → Prevent → Scale
What you get
What you get
What you get
What you get
Testing 620,000 invoice lines against 340 rate schedules at 120 lines a day is over 5,000 analyst-days — about 21 analyst-years — which is why upstream operators audit this spend after the fact, if at all.
The same solution, in the language of your industry — where this problem lives and what the agents do about it.
A company man signs the field ticket at 2am; the invoice arrives weeks later carrying day rates, standby, mob/demob, rentals and pass-throughs. AP matches the invoice to the ticket — not to the rate schedule — so standby bills at operating rate and equipment keeps billing after rig release.
The agents connect every invoice line to its ticket, well, AFE and the rate schedule in force, and test rate, hours and equipment status before approval. Off-schedule rates, double-billed mobilization and post-release rentals are held pre-payment — with the ticket and the clause attached for the vendor conversation.
Global SIs bill thousands of invoices across projects, geographies and blended rate cards — onshore/offshore mix, role-based rates, T&M against fixed-bid milestones. Every CIO suspects overbilling somewhere in there; no team can check it by hand.
The agents test each line against the contracted rate card for that role and geography, verify the offshore ratio the deal promised, and hold milestone billing until acceptance is recorded. Rate drift, ineligible roles and premature milestones are stopped before payment — across the whole SI portfolio, every month.
Invoice Assurance is Rivvun’s agentic AI invoice audit: contract-aware validation of supplier invoices before or during payment approval. Invoice Steward, the AI agent behind it, tests each charge against the governing contract, rate card, cap, milestone, credit, fee rule and delivery evidence to decide whether the line is commercially payable.
No. Match compares invoice, PO and receipt — and none of those documents carries the contracted rate, the cap, the credit or the service level. The match can pass while the charge breaches the contract. Rivvun adds the commercial authority the match never had.
AP automation moves the invoice faster; anomaly detection flags statistical outliers. Neither can say whether a charge is contractually payable. Rivvun answers that question line by line — expected versus billed under the governing terms — and states the action that follows: clear, hold or route.
Invoice validation is a broad term covering format, tax, duplicate-payment and PO checks. Rivvun includes those, then adds commercial entitlement — what the supplier is actually allowed to bill: the specific rate, quantity, fee, milestone or service under the governing contract.
Contract-to-invoice compliance is the validation of invoice charges against the governing supplier contract and its effective amendments, schedules and rate cards. It identifies when an invoice and PO agree with each other but conflict with the actual negotiated terms.
Invoice Steward calculates the contractually payable amount, compares it with the billed amount and routes the variance through the configured approval and supplier-resolution workflow. Compliant amounts can proceed while material noncompliant charges are corrected or held within policy.
Yes. Invoice Assurance applies audit-grade commercial checks before payment where the evidence exists — a pre-payment invoice audit rather than a look-back. It also flags historical paid transactions that belong in Supplier Leakage Recovery, Rivvun’s post-payment recovery solution.
Pre-payment assurance stops a noncompliant amount before it leaves the enterprise; a recovery audit examines historical payments and chases a credit, refund or repayment afterwards. Rivvun runs both from the same governing evidence and control logic — one payment-integrity discipline across prevention and recovery.
Rivvun links the invoice to the relevant SOW, rate card, milestone, timesheet, service entry, acceptance record, ticket or other operational evidence. Where the governing evidence is incomplete, the line is routed with the missing evidence identified rather than being automatically approved or rejected.
Only within policy. Invoice Steward auto-clears compliant lines inside configured policy and confidence thresholds. Every consequential action — holding a payment, adjusting a charge, contacting a supplier — requires human approval, with segregation of duties enforced. The AI agent decides and prepares; accountable people approve.
Identified variance, validated variance, prevented leakage, recovered value and realized hard savings are recorded separately. Prevented value requires evidence that the noncompliant amount was not paid. Recovered value requires a received credit, refund, repayment or offset.
Give us one invoice cohort and the contracts behind it. We return the exception queue, the evidence on every line and the control coverage map.
Start an Invoice Assurance value scan →